Statistic | Bigfork | Montana | National |
Population | 4,733 | 1,068,778 | 328,239,523 |
Population density (sq mi) | 151 | 7 | 91 |
Median age | 55.9 | 39.8 | 37.7 |
Male/Female ratio | 0.9:1 | 1.0:1 | 1.0:1 |
Married (15yrs & older) | 69% | 58% | 55% |
Families w/ Kids under 18 | 24% | 40% | 43% |
Speak English | 95% | 96% | 79% |
Speak Spanish | 3% | 1% | 13% |
The demographics of Bigfork offer invaluable insights into the composition, dynamics and needs of both urban and rural areas, empowering planners, developers and policymakers to foster prosperity, equity, and well-being for all residents. With a population of 4,733, Bigfork exhibits a population density of 151 people per square mile, contrasting with the national average of 91. The median age stands at 55.9, with 69% of individuals aged 15 or older being married and 24% having children under 18. In terms of income equality in Bigfork, 14% of households report a median income below $25,000, while 25% report an income exceeding $150,000, showcasing a diverse economic landscape.
Understanding the Bigfork racial demographics and ethnic composition is paramount for addressing systemic inequities, advancing social justice and inclusion and fortifying communities. In Bigfork, the racial breakdown indicates 90.5% White, 0.1% Black or African American, 0.3% Asian, 0.9% American Indian and 0% Native Hawaiian, with 8.6% of the population identifying as Hispanic or Latino. Notably, 94.8% of households reported speaking English only, while 3.4% reported speaking Spanish only. Additionally, 5% of residents were categorized as foreign-born.
Areas with lower than average population density like Bigfork, could offer a more relaxed pace of life, closer connection to nature, extraordinary sense of community, greater affordability and tend to be safer, making them attractive options for those seeking a quieter, more peaceful lifestyle away from the hustle and bustle of urban living. These areas often have a lower cost of living, with housing prices that are typically more affordable and residents may also benefit from lower taxes, living expenses and insurance rates. Low population density areas also tend to have lower crime rates compared to densely populated urban areas. This can contribute to a greater sense of safety and security for residents and their families. The Bigfork population density is 151 people per square mile, which is lower than 50% of the cities across the country, putting it in a position to take advantage of all these great benefits.
A city with fewer children like Bigfork can offer several benefits, catering to a demographic where families with fewer or no children may find an ideal environment. The advantages could include a quiet environment, increased focus on adult-oriented amenities, reduced traffic and increased affordability. Perhaps the biggest benefit could be a greater availability of housing options that cater to adult residents or smaller households. This could include more condominiums, apartments, or single-family homes designed for couples or individuals without children, providing a wider range of choices for prospective homebuyers or renters. Areas with fewer kids could also be an indication that this area could be a suitable area for retirees or seniors. In Bigfork, only 24% of people have kids under the age of 18, which is far less than the national average. Another 69% of residents over 15 years old are married. This bodes well for taking advantage of all the benefits of an area where less kids are present.
Urban Development: Utilizing Bigfork demographic statistics and data, urban planners can craft and develop areas that cater to local residents, encompassing housing, transportation and public services, all while emphasizing sustainability and enriching quality of life. Demographic transitions can contribute to gentrification and neighborhood evolution, whether in urban or rural environments. As neighborhoods draw in new residents with varying income levels and lifestyle preferences, property values may appreciate, potentially displacing longtime inhabitants and reshaping the neighborhood's fabric. Comprehensive insights into population density, age distribution, household size, and income levels are instrumental in guiding decisions regarding zoning, transportation infrastructure, housing expansion and public amenities. Harnessing Bigfork demographic stats for planning and executing affordable housing initiatives can serve as a preventive measure against displacement.
Social Cohesion: Reporting and analyzing demographics can play a crucial role in fostering social cohesion and understanding among diverse communities. By recognizing and appreciating differences in Bigfork demographics, societies can promote inclusivity, diversity and social harmony, while addressing social disparities and promoting equal opportunities for all individuals. Racial demographics reflect the diversity of a population and contribute to fostering inclusive and welcoming communities. Embracing diversity strengthens social cohesion, promotes cultural understanding and enriches the fabric of society by celebrating the contributions of individuals from different racial and ethnic backgrounds.
Healthcare Planning: Analyzing the demographic data in Bigfork has the potential to inform healthcare planning and delivery by identifying population health needs, disparities and risk factors. Healthcare providers and policymakers can allocate resources more effectively, develop prevention and intervention programs and address health inequities within communities by understanding demographic trends. Leveraging demographic statistics can enable healthcare providers and policymakers to strive for equitable, accessible and high-quality healthcare for all individuals and communities. This proactive healthcare planning approach ensures targeted interventions, efficient resource allocation and tailored healthcare services to meet diverse population needs.
Race | Bigfork | Montana | National |
White | 90.53% | 89.11% | 73.35% |
Black | 0.11% | 0.42% | 12.63% |
Asian | 0.27% | 0.73% | 5.22% |
American Indian | 0.89% | 6.57% | 0.82% |
Native Hawaiian | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.18% |
Mixed race | 6.25% | 2.59% | 3.06% |
Other race | 1.94% | 0.50% | 4.75% |